Comments

  • Section 25 does not offend Article 21 of the Constitution as it has sufficiently protected the basic right of an accused to defend himself; T.Babulal v.Drugs Inspector, Madras, 1969 Cri LJ 699: (1970) 1 M LJ 124.
  • There can be no prejudice to the accused if the Drugs Inspector, instead of sending the sample to the Government Analyst, sends it to a higher authority namely the Central Drugs Laboratory; Ram Shankar Misra v. State of U.P., (1980) 1 SCC 255.
  • The Public Analyst can analyse the sample himself or cause it to be analysed by some other person; Bechan v.State, AIR 1966 All 91:1966 Cri LJ 122.
  • It is not necessary to mention in the analysis report the methods or technological processes adopted by the Analyst; Dhian Singh v.Municipal Board, Saharanpur, AIR 1970 SC 318: (1969) 2 SCC 371.
  • If accused wants to call the Public Analyst as a witness it is his duty to take appropriate steps; Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Asa Ram, 1972 Cri LJ 1651 (Del.).

Penalty for manufacture, sale, etc., of drugs in contravention of this Chapter

Whoever, himself or by any other person on his behalf, manufacturers for sale or for distribution, or sells, or stocks or exhibits or offers for sale or distributes,-

  • Any drug deemed to be adulterated under section 17A or spurious under section 17B or which when used by any person for or in the diagnosis, treatment, mitigation, or prevention of any disease or disorder is likely to cause his death or is likely to cause such harm on his body as would amount to grievous hurt within the meaning of section 320 of the Indian Penal Code solely on account of such drug being adulterated or spurious or not of standard quality, as the case may be, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than five years but which may extend to a term of life and with fine which shall not be less than ten thousand rupees ;
  • Any drug
  • Deemed to be adulterated under section 17A, but not being a drug referred to in clause (a), or
  • Without a valid licence as required under clause © of section 18, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to three years and with fine which shall not be less than five thousand rupees :
  • Provided that the Court may, for any adequate and special reasons to be recorded in the judgment, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year and of fine of less than five thousand rupees :
  • Any drug deemed to be spurious under section 17B, but not being a drug referred to in clause (a) shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three years but which may extend to five years and with fine which shall not be less than five thousand rupees :
  • Provided that the Court may, for any adequate and special reasons, to be recorded in the judgement, impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than three years but not less than one year,
  • Any drug, other than a drug referred to in clause (a) or clause (b) or clause (c), in contravention of any other provision of this Chapter or any rule made there under, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than one year but which may extend to two years and with fine :
  • Provided that the Court may for any adequate and special reasons to be recorded in the judgement impose a sentence of imprisonment for a term of less than one year.
Go to Navigation